CHEROKEE COUNTY
SHERIFF'S OFFICE
2003 SERVICE QUALITY
ASSESSMENT

 

 

 

Prepared By:

 

The A.L. Burruss Institute of Public Service Kennesaw State University Kennesaw, Georgia

 

 

On Behalf Of:

 

The Cherokee County Sheriff's Office Canton, Georgia

 

April 2003

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Introduction 1
   
Executive Summary 2
   
Profile of the Respondents 5
   
General Evaluations of the Sheriff's Office and Other Law Enforcement Issues 6
    Overall Evaluation of CCSO
6
    Evaluations of Overall Professionalism
9
    Perceptions of Crime Rate in Cherokee
11
    Perceptions of Change in Crime Rate
11
    General Perceptions of Traffic Enforcement
14
   
Neighborhood Safety Issues and the CCSO 17
    Traffic Safety in Respondents' Neighborhoods
17
    Evaluation of General Safety in Respondents' Neighborhoods
17
    Safety of Respondent's Neighborhood Compared to Others
19
    Most Serious Public Safety Problem in Neighborhood
19
    Neighborhood Watch Programs
21
    Neighborhood Patrols by CCSO
21
   
Interaction With The CCSO: Traffic Stops, Accidents, and Other Requests For Assistance 22
    Traffic Violations
22
    Treatment During Traffic Accident Investigations
24
    Home Safety and the CCSO
24
    Personal Visits to Main Headquarters
26
    Personal Visits to South Annex
29
   
Sources of Information and the Image of the Sheriff's Office 30
    Sources of Information about the Sheriff's Office
30
    Image of CCSO Projected By Sources of Information
33
    Relative Image Projected By Specific Primary Sources
33
   
Appendix 34

INTRODUCTION

In the fall of 2002, the A.L. Burruss Institute of Public Service at Kennesaw State University was asked by the Cherokee County Sheriff's Office (CCSO) (Mr. Roger Garrison, Sheriff) to conduct a Service Quality Assessment. The study was designed to ascertain the impressions of the citizens of Cherokee County toward the overall performance of the Sheriff's Office, as well as the quality of services received from the Sheriff's Office during various types of specific contacts between representatives of that office and Cherokee residents. A similar study was conducted by the Institute for the CCSO in 1999.

The study is based on a random survey of adults 18 years of age and older. The survey was conducted by telephone in February 2003 from the Institute's Survey Research Laboratory. A randomized list of Cherokee County telephone numbers was provided by Survey Sampling, Inc., of Fairfield, Connecticut. The numbers were screened to eliminate businesses and other unqualified numbers. When more than one qualified potential respondent resided in a household, a random selection process was used to identify the adult to be surveyed from that household. A total of 458 respondents were surveyed. The survey has an overall margin of error of ± 5%.

At the request of the Sheriff's Office, questions were included in the survey that allowed us to determine whether or not a respondent lives in an unincorporated area of the county or within one of the incorporated cities in Cherokee. In addition, for respondents living in unincorporated areas, it was determined whether or not the respondent lived east or west of Interstate 575, and north or south of Highway 20 (Canton Highway). These respondents were then categorized according to which quadrant of the county they reside in (i.e., NE, SE, NW, SW).

An Executive Summary is included immediately after this Introduction. The survey instrument is included in Appendix A.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS

The following is a summary of the characteristics of the respondents:

GENERAL EVALUATIONS OF THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUES

The respondents were asked a number of questions related to general evaluations of various aspects of the Sheriff's Office, including its overall performance, level of professionalism, efforts to enforce the county's traffic laws and perceptions of the county's crime rate.

Overall Evaluation of CCSO Over one-half (53%) of the respondents believe the overall performance of the Cherokee County Sheriff's Office is either "excellent" (20%) or "very good" (33%) (see Figure A). Just six percent (6%) suggested the performance of the CCSO is only "fair," while 2% said its performance is "poor." Further analysis reveals:

It also is possible that the respondents' relative evaluations of the overall performance of the CCSO are related to their perceptions of the level of crime in Cherokee County, and whether or not the respondents have had specific contact with the CCSO and,

more importantly, their level of satisfaction with the outcome of those contacts. There is some merit to these suppositions, although it is important to keep in mind that relatively few people overall expressed unfavorable opinions of the CCSO in any way. Further analysis reveals:

Finally, the percentage of respondents in 2003 who said the overall performance of the CCSO is either "excellent" or "very good" represents a small improvement over the results from 1999 (53% to 47%, respectively).

Evaluations Of Overall Professionalism

When asked to evaluate the overall professionalism of the CCSO, over one-half (56%) of the respondents said the CCSO is "very professional" (See Figure B). Only 2% of the respondents feel the CCSO is "not professional at all." There was no relationship between responses to this question and any of the background characteristics of the respondents. There is evidence that the respondents' evaluations of the Sheriff's Office overall level of professionalism is related to the experiences the respondents may have had with the CCSO. Specifically,

Finally, the percentage of respondents in the 2003 survey who said the CCSO is "very professional" reflects a significant improvement from the 1999 results (55% to 46%, respectively).

Perception Of Crime Rate In Cherokee County Compared To Other Localities

Even though a sizeable percentage of respondents believe the crime rate in Cherokee County has gone up in the last five years, when asked to compare the crime rate in Cherokee County to the rates in other local counties almost two-thirds (64%) of the respondents said the crime rate in Cherokee is either "a little low" (47%) or "very low" (17%) compared to other localities (See Figure C). Only 15% of the respondents suggested the crime rate in Cherokee is higher than in other local counties. Further analysis reveals:

Finally, there is virtually no difference between the opinions of the respondents in 2003 compared to those of the 1999 survey on this issue.

Perceptions Of Change In Cherokee Crime Rate Over Last Five Years

Thirty-eight percent (38%) of the respondents believe the crime rate has gone up in Cherokee County over the past five years (See Figure D). Thirty-five percent (35%)

believe the crime rate is about the same now as it was five years ago. Further analysis reveals:

Finally, the percentage of respondents in 2003 who feel the crime rate in Cherokee County has gone up in the last five years represents a small improvement over the results of the1999 survey (38% to 45%, respectively).

General Perceptions Of Traffic Enforcement

Forty percent (40%) of the respondents believe the CCSO has done either an "excellent" (11%) or "very good" (29%) job enforcing the traffic laws in unincorporated Cherokee County (see Figure E). Only fifteen percent said the Sheriff's Office has done a "fair" (12%) or "poor" (3%) job in this area. Respondents between the ages of 35 and 44 were somewhat more likely (24%) to believe the Sheriff's Office is doing just a "fair" (20%) or "poor" (4%) job of enforcing the traffic laws in the unincorporated areas of the county. Otherwise, there was no relationship between opinions on this issue and the background characteristics of the respondents.

The percentage of respondents in 2003 who believe the CCSO is doing only a "fair" or "poor" job of traffic enforcement has declined by more than 50% over the percentage from the 1999 survey (15% to 31%, respectively).

NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY ISSUES AND THE CCSO

The respondents were asked about a number of public safety issues related to their neighborhoods. Included in these issues were questions about traffic safety, the general safety of the respondents and their property, the relative safety of their neighborhoods compared to other parts of the county, the most serious public safety problem facing their neighborhoods, the existence and effectiveness of Neighborhood Watch programs, and whether or not the respondents believe the CCSO adequately patrols their neighborhoods.

Traffic Safety In Respondents' Neighborhoods

When asked to rate traffic safety in their neighborhoods on a 1-10 scale, where "1" represented a "very dangerous" traffic situation and "10" meant the traffic in their neighborhoods was "very safe", the average traffic safety rating score was 5.93 (see Figure F). Almost one-third (31%) of the respondents gave a traffic safety rating of "8" or higher; just 19% of the respondents rated traffic safety as a "3" or lower. Long-time residents of Cherokee County expressed a slightly lower average traffic safety rating than did newer residents (5.67 to 6.20, respectively), but this difference should not be overemphasized. Otherwise, there was no significant relationship between traffic safety ratings and other background characteristics of the respondents.

The average traffic safety rating increased slightly between 1999 and 2003 (5.07 to 5.93).

Evaluation Of General Safety In Respondents' Neighborhoods

The respondents were asked to rate the overall safety of their neighborhoods on the same 1-10 scale. The average neighborhood safety rating was 8.00 (see Figure F). Two-thirds (68%) of the respondents rated their neighborhoods as an "8" or higher. Traffic safety ratings were uniformly high among all demographic subgroups of the respondents.

The average neighborhood safety rating increased slightly between 1999 and 2003 (7.69 to 8.00).

Safety Of Respondent's Neighborhood Compared To Other Areas Of The County

Seventy-nine percent (79%) of the respondents believe their neighborhood is safer to live in than most other neighborhoods. Only 7% said their neighborhoods are more dangerous than others. The remaining respondents said their neighborhoods are the same as the others, or offered no opinion at all. Respondents living in unincorporated Cherokee are somewhat more likely than those living within city limits to think their neighborhoods are safer than others (86% to 74%, respectively) but this difference is not dramatic and should not be overemphasized. Otherwise, there were no relationship between responses to this question and other background characteristics of the respondents.

These results are virtually unchanged from the results of the 1999 survey.

Most Serious Public Safety Problem In Neighborhood

The respondents also were asked to identify the most serious public safety issue plaguing their neighborhood. The respondents were given seven problems (randomly rotated for each respondent) to choose from, with the option of specifying a problem not included on the list. As Figure G indicates, 44% of the respondents mentioned traffic safety while 11% mentioned loose pets or other animals. Crimes against property and drugs were each mentioned by 8% of the respondents. Other problems were each mentioned by fewer than 5% of the respondents, and 13% of the respondents were unable to provide any meaningful response to this question. Although the same general pattern existed for subgroups of the population, a few variations should be noted: